Net Yaroze Game Jam 2023

Next Gen 25-Videogame school and build a better game

May 23, 2021, at 10:26 AM by mgarcia in Media, Articles (5 comments)

Title: Next Gen 25-Videogame school and build a better game Author: mgarcia Date: 2021-05-23 18:26 +1000 Tags: Media, Articles Comments: Open

Size: 14.21 MB[Player volume: MAX]


Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

Below is a transcription of two articles from Next Generation magazine, issue #25, January 1997.

This issue would have been written in late 1996, pre-launch of the western "Net Yaroze" release, and using the English translation 'Yarouze', pronounced Yar-rose-a.

In the next issue, February #26, Next Generation printed the following-

We say Yarouze, Sony says Yaroze
Following NG's exclusive unveiling of Sony’s “Make your own PlayStation games” initiative last month, Sony has changed the name of the program from Yarouze to Yaroze. Why? "It’s kinda easy that way," offered a Sony spokesperson.

The first article here is called 'So what do they teach you at videogame school?', which was printed from page 7. Here the president of Digipen is interviewed and asked about his thoughts on Yarouze, how to best take advantage of it and the value of specialized education.

The next article is called 'If you can build a better game...', printed from page 42, which talks about the Yarouze program in detail, but more interestingly, it explains the difficulty of the 1990's independent developer and the forward thinking that Sony and the Yarouze program introduced. Next, SCEA executives are interviewed, in the section 'The company line', which is similar to the UK EDGE magazine issue #41, January 1997 (Yaroze - Black to basics for Sony?). Lastly, 4 US game developers share their 'Pro Tips', giving advice in relation to the Yarouze.

At the end of this page is an email thread from Matthew Hulett, a SCEA Net Yaroze member, to Michael Fulton from Sony Interactive (America), asking about C++, Code Warrior, data streaming and the limitations mentioned in this article.

There is a lot of text here, I thought it would be best to keep it all together in one single page, as it's all pertinent to this magazine issue.

The two articles are available also in PDF form.

Any questions ask below.

Montage of Next Gen 25 Net Yaroze related articles
Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

So what do they teach you at videogame school?

Claude Comair, the president of the Digipen school for videogame programmers, offers his advice to those who want to turn a hobby into a profession.

Sony's new PlayStation: If you can build a better game...

Sony's Yarouze system lets anyone make a game. We show you how with tips from the pros. Yarouze (the Japanese word roughly translates as "Let's Do It!") is a new program from Sony designed to enable anyone with a PC or Mac to make PlayStation games. It's a revolutionary concept, and Next Generation has the exclusive story on page 38. Sony's latest machine costs around $800, is matte black, plugs into a PC or Mac, and is scheduled for a U.S. release this March. Excited? You should be. Because Sony's Yarouze system gives you everything you need to program your own PlayStation game.

For author and editorial information, please click on the image on the left, it will open in a new window.

Magazine Opening Page

So could you make a game as good as Nights?

Cool gift, right? An exclusive version of Yui Naka's Nights for Saturn - from Sega of America and Next Generation. We hope you enjoy this, your essential Next Generation Disc - and we also hope you enjoy this month's lead feature. The sleek black PlayStation you see on these pages hasn't been revealed in the U.S. before. Its a special edition playStation designed to form the centerpiece of a 1997 program from Sony called Yarouze (the Japanese word roughly translates as "Let's Do It").

Gamers who buy a Yarouze system (Sony estimates that it will Sell for around $750) get a black PlayStation, a serial link to connect it to your Mac or PC, a CD of PlayStation programming libraries, and membership to an online resource of tips, advice, and updates from Sony Computer Entertainment of America.

And what does all this add up to? All the equipment you need to make your own PlayStation games. This is a revolutionary concept. But its not a new one.

Click to open hi-res image on new browser.Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

In the early 1980s, young upstarts like Dave Perry and Peter Molyneux were programming their first games on 8-bit "home computers" such as the Commodore 64 and the Sinclair Spectrum. These game machines (make no mistake, the "home computer" tag was usually just a marketing ploy) could be programmed by anyone who chose to learn. They came equipped with a keyboard, writable memory, and a chunky instruction manual. Even game magazines of the time were filled with Program listings, and for budding game makers looking to learn their trade, it was the perfect environment.

But since that time, the low-cost home computers have been replaced by videogame consoles (with no keyboards or programming instruction manuals). Simultaneously, the sophistication of PC technology has sped beyond the grasp of ordinary gamers. For most gamers, "making your own game" would be practically impossible.

Until now. With a modest grasp of the programming language C, all gamers can start on the road to becoming a game developer. And who will be the next Dave Perry or Peter Molyneux?

It could be you...

So what do they teach you at videogame school?

If you want to make games for a living, then you should listen to Claude Comair, president of the Digipen school of videogame programming. In this exclusive interview with NG, he gives his advise to those who'd like to turn a hobby into a profession.

Claude Comair, the president of the Digipen school for videogame programmers, offers his advice to those who want to turn a hobby into a profession.

Digipen is the world's first videogame school, and typically, there are hundreds of applicants for each place in its classes. So, for gamers contemplating buying a Sony Yarouze system and making games at home, Next Gen talks to Digipen's Claude Comair to ask...

So what do they teach you at videogame school?

Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

Sony's Yarouze system will enable many people have a go at programming their own games for the first time. It's an exciting prospect - but also a tough one. So what pitfalls lay in wait for each budding game programmer? What are the common mistakes that first-time programmers make? How can these problems be avoided? What should you do if you stumble upon the best game idea since Tetris? And what should you do if you want to turn game programming into a profession?

Claude Comair should know the answers to all these questions. As head of Digipen, the videogame programming school located in Vancouver, it's his job to know. So, if class is all sitting comfortably, over to you Claude...

The first videogame school?

Next Gen: How did Digipen get started?

Claude: Digipen began in the late 1980s, but it was in 1991 - after we realized that we wanted to open a school for animation and videogame programming - that we approached Nintendo for some sponsorship, and they were extremely happy to lend a hand setting up the school we have today. Now we have two sides to the school, a videogame programming side and an animation side.

Next Gen: Where have Digipen graduates ended up?

Claude: On the videogame side, we have some working at Konami and some working at Iguana, for example. These ex-students of our programming division are actually leading the coding of projects.

Next Gen: So does the videogame side of the Digipen school concentrate on just programming? Or do students also learn game design, user interface, and the other elements that go into a game?

Claude: On the videogame side, the main focus is on programming and is mostly science-based. The other side of the school studies animation, and is therefore more focused on art. But there is a good symbiotic relationship between the students from the two camps - they actually intermix and cooperate on common projects. So often students' games will include animation coming from the animation students.

Next Gen: So the videogame programmers don't have to learn to do everything themselves?

Claude: Well, despite the availability of students from the other department, and despite the game programmer himself or herself knowing the basics of teamwork, students still have to come up with their own ideas, their own documentation, and their own game bibles. Sure, if they need help in specific areas, they can ask for help. But they are taught not just the technical techniques of producing games, but also story development and so on.

Next Gen: So each student learns a little bit about all the aspects of developing a videogame?

Claude: In a team, the programmer needs to know about artists' capabilities - and the best way to do that is to attempt to do something on their own. They are programmers, but they need to be able to talk to the artist, to deal with an artist, to explain what can be done or what cannot be done on the hardware that they are using.

Better yet, they sit down and take the electronic pen, or graphic program, or the 3D package and try to attempt to do something - nothing pretentious, but just enough to know what steps the person goes through. Simultaneously, an artist should be taught about programming and what the hardware can do. Ideally, a team comprises people who have all attempted to do the jobs of others, in order to understand the position a colleague is in when asked this or that question. This way, you will achieve a more symbiotic relationship.

Basically, the ideal is a creative person who is also an unbelievable scientist, but unfortunately it's not always the case.

"Why will people want to play your game? Students have to research this question, and come up with a decent answer"

Next Gen: But the emphasis is on programming?

Claude: Let's say that 90% of the time our students spend learning general mathematics and computer graphics mathematics, which is more toward matrixes, matrix algebra, vector geometry, and so forth.

Next Gen: Why such an emphasis on mathematics?

Claude: Because math is at the core of programming and understanding computers.

Game ingredients.

Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

Next Gen: So how do Digipen's students learn about level design, gameplay, user interface, and all the other factors that determine whether a game is good or bad?

Claude: At Digipen, specialized people will teach you this. We have a very good teacher here who guides our students in this respect and reviews their proposals. All students have to present a proposal document, which is a couple hundred pages thick, trying to convince us why the game they are proposing is good. It also contains an outline of the game's components, how much money they would need to complete it, how many people it would require, what kind of machinery it will take, what kind of specialized talent, and so on.

And yes, one component we study is the interface design. We always try to put ourselves into the shoes of the player and see what psychologically or logically is most instinctive. Would you put your finger to the left first or to the right first? How would you hold the joypad, and what are the ergonomics? How would these physical ergonomics translate into an interface on the screen - would you look first to the left or to the bottom? When you click on something to quit, you should be asked to confirm that you want to quit. If you say yes, you quit; if you say no, you get music welcoming you back into the game, rewarding you. All these things need to be thought of.

Next Gen: It's hard to imagine that someone at home with a Yarouze system would think of all this.

Claude: I believe that many people doing it on their own would miss these little things - and that is why I would recommend that if you would like to pursue programming as a career, then you should seek universities and schools to guide you properly.

How to make games at home.

Next Gen: But given that not everyone can attend Digipen, what advice can you give budding programmers who want to start learning with Sony's Yarouze system? What should they do first?

Claude: I would suggest that people should try to make a puzzle game, in order to test their ability in coding to begin with. Also, puzzle games show a lot of a person's creativity. If I gave you $20 million, lots of explosives, and some stunt people and said, "Go make a film", you could create a big splash on the screen that would cater to many people. But if I gave you a couple of dollars and an instamatic camera - then you would have to compensate for a lack of good equipment with a lot of imagination.

Next Gen: And the same is true of videogames?

Claude: Millions of people still play Tetris - and yet it is a good example of a program task that can be achieved by just one person.

Next Gen: OK, so after completing a puzzle game, what should Yarouze users keep in mind when they try to tackle something a little bigger?

Claude: They have to keep in perspective two things:

  • One, that the game is made of two components living in close relationship - one cannot live without the other;
  • Two, and a result of this, they need to study their computer sciences.

The two components that make up a game are the story and the artificial intelligence that actually drives the story and results in graphics on the screen. These two major components - art and computer code - have to come together in a very coherent way. A game without the story is not a good game. A good story without clever code turning it into a game is no good either. Thus, no matter how great a game programmer's imagination may be, the basics cannot be ignored. Game makers have to know their mathematics very well and computer science very well.

Next Gen: Yarouze comes complete with many programming libraries, so doesn't this to some extent reduce the need for math and programming skill?

Claude: The danger is that games made by cutting and pasting libraries in this way may end up looking the same - and I don't think that this is what Sony intends. Certainly, it's not the best way to learn how to program games for a living.

Real programmers should be able to reproduce for themselves all of these routines and libraries of code that come with any system - and outperform them many times. Certainly it is this way if they want to become professionals. Professionals want "fat-free" code - code that is very optimized, and put together in the fastest, most economical way possible. This sort of code is often the only real difference between a bad game and a great one.

Next Gen: So you're saying that using these libraries is like, say, a supposed "master chef" simply heating up oven-ready meals - he's not really making anything. And your recommendation to someone who wants to turn programming into a profession is to learn how to make their own libraries - and this means studying computer science and math?

Claude: Yes, because this way, you will fully understand the programming tools you purchase and use. You will have a full awareness of what a tool can do, and sometimes maybe you can actually bypass some of its functions and do something great. Pens you can buy anywhere, but not all of us can write poetry. Do you see what I mean?

Next Gen: Presumably, you also need to know your computer languages well...

Claude: Obviously, you need to know your computer languages perfectly because that is the only way in which you can talk to the hardware - and this is at the heart of what you are doing. If you are talking inadequately, you immediately have a handicap.

"Pens you can buy anywhere, but not all of us can write poetry..."

Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

Next Gen: And study of computer science will help you understand how these languages work?

Claude: You need to know all your devices - all your IO boards, all your interrupts, all of what makes up the computer you're working with - in order to be able to drive the machine at the lowest level possible. You don't want to pile up too many translators between yourself and the hardware because they will slow you down.

Next Gen: What other disciplines should potential games programmers study?

Claude: Physics is also important.

Next Gen: Why physics?

Claude: Because most of the time games are an interactive simulation of the real world. The real world is governed by the laws of physics - gravity, motion dynamics, wave optics, and so on. And these have to be understood by the person who is trying to create that simulation.

"If you wish to simulate the real world, then you need to understand how the real world works - and that means physics."

Next Gen: So once a budding game programmer has a great idea, has studied all he needs to study, and is about to embark on making a game, what common mistakes is he likely to make?

Claude: I believe that the biggest mistake would be not approaching a professional game company! Many game programmers forget that the best productions are usually the result of teamwork, and that a established development company can offer tremendous support.

I have this problem with my students. We beg them to come to school,to do all their work at school, and to team up with other students. We beg them. And yet we have all these students who are rich enough to get their own computers - and they do their homework at home. They disappear during the evenings, they don't share information with the others, and they think they are doing the right thing. But when they come and face the results of the group, they realize how weak their project is.

The secret is teamwork...

Next Gen: So you advise Yarouze users to team up?

Claude: I think they should organize themselves into a team with various capabilities and various talents and act as if they were a company. Put things into perspective - their charts and goals. And do a study of who would buy the game they plan to make and why would they buy it. The next thing you know, they are doing what every game producer does.

Next Gen: So you don't see any new solo videogame "stars" emerging from the Yarouze project?

Claude: Well, it will make us more aware of who is out there - it "gives the mike" to some new people - but the 1980s era when one person could make a hit game by himself is long gone. These days games cost in the millions of dollars to produce - and no investor is going to give this money to one guy working from his bedroom. In 1996, a game will probably employ 10 to 15 people, working for one or two years.

Next Gen: So you think Yarouze is a bad idea?

Claude: No, of course not. And a lot of amateur talent will be discovered this way.

But we must not give the impression that Yarouze, or any solo solution is like a pill that can be bought off the shelf for solving a headache or something. Game development requires lots of people in this day and age, and at Digipen we emphasize that this is not a solo adventure. It is no longer an affair where in a basement where you can solve all the problems on your own.

Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

Selling the big idea.

Next Gen: But surely someone could come up with a good idea on their own in their bedroom?

Claude: Of course, you could come up with a good idea - but you'd still need the support of a major corporation to back you up in order for you to produce it.

Next Gen: So if someone does come up with a great idea, should they present it to an established software publisher?

Claude: Absolutely. Unless this person is heir to a humongous fortune...

Next Gen: And how should the game publisher be approached?

Claude: If someone is in possession of a good idea, I would recommend that they keep it very confidential - publishers don't like games everyone knows about. The publisher also needs to know that the idea is genuine and does not contain material that is subject to lawsuits.

And if the publisher says, "No, it is not something that I would like to produce," then they should actually listen carefully and not get personal or angry. But ask themselves, "Why does this person not want to put in the money?". People might realize that they misjudged the value of their side of the story. If you are a person that is constantly misunderstood by the population of publishers, then maybe that should be a message to you that maybe you're not answering their need.

If the publisher says "Yes," however, then you're in luck.

For more Digipen information

If you would like further information about the Digipen school, write:
5th Floor, 530 Hornby Street
V6C 2E7

End of article.

Sony's new PlayStation: If you can build a better game...

Sony plans to reintroduce the pioneering spirit of game development's "good old days" with a $750 PlayStation development system that lets you make your own games. A Next Generation exclusive.

Click to open hi-res image on new browser.Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

Sometime in the first quarter of 1997, Sony Computer Entertainment America (SCEA) will introduce a new product into the U.S. market called Yarouze.

Available only from Sony, it will cost around $750 (final pricing has yet to be set) and contain a special black PlayStation, a serial cable for connecting the system to a PC or Mac, and a CD filled with PlayStation programming libraries, a C compiler and debugger, and other development tools. For the first time ever, consumers will be able to program their own games for a console system. If you don't realize what an important development this is, you probably shouldn't be reading this magazine.

Over the next 10 pages, Next Generation will present the first English language, in-depth report on the system. What it is, how the Yarouze program will work, and what it means for gamers and the industry as a whole. As a service to our readers (many of whom will no doubt order a system as soon as possible) we have also included tips on game design issues from the pros. Enjoy...

What's the big deal anyway?

Sony wants to return some of 1997's game development back to the way it was 15 years ago, an age when gamers made games themselves, for themselves. It's a decision that could save the industry - and turn some kids into programming stars.

Yarouze - a Japanese word that roughly translates to "let's do it!" is one of the most significant developments in the game industry in years. This innovative program, conceived by PlayStation creator Ken Kutaragi, will, for the first time, allow enthusiasts to create their own console games.

Released in Japan in late 1996, it will ship in the United States sometime in the first quarter of 1997 (a release date was not set at press time). Basically, Yarouze is a program that includes software for PC (or Mac), hardware in the form of a specially modified, black PlayStation, and membership of a development club that takes the form of a private Internet website. With Yarouze, hobbyists can create software for PlayStation for under a thousand dollars. No official price point has been set in the U.S., but Next Generation expects the system to sell for about $750.

$5 billion of game software and hardware will be sold in the U.S. this year. It's an industry dominated by corporations. But it wasn't always this way...

The CD that comes with Yarouze contains a C compiler, a debugger, tools for converting graphic and sound files to PlayStation format, and the PlayStation development C libraries - the same libraries that make developing for PlayStation so much easier than for Saturn, Nintendo 64, or even PC.

The system is not quite as robust as the professional level PlayStation development system. Any software created for Yarouze must fit entirely in the PlayStation"s 3.5MB of RAM (2MB main RAM, 1MB VRAM, and 512K sound RAM), so libraries for things like streaming video or data off a CD are not included. How much of a handicap is that? Not too much - Ridge Racer fits entirely within system RAM and could be done with Yarouze.

The website will provide a place for Yarouze owners - members is a better word - to ask questions of Sony technical support staff, upload and download software, and talk to each other about development issues. The web site currently serving the Japanese Yarouze program also sponsors members' homepages, but it is not known if the U.S. site will at this time.

Text under image of 4 screenshot: "These efforts from the Yarouze program in Japan are very impressive for first-generation titles. Sure, they're mostly 3D shooters (always a shareware favorite), with the odd puzzler thrown in for good measure, but compared to most PC shareware efforts, they look great."

To fully understand the potential significance of Yarouze, some history is required. The video and computer game industry is huge - the latest figures indicate that over $5 billion of hardware and software will be sold in the U.S. this year. Increasingly, though, it's an industry dominated by a few massive corporations. But things weren't always this way.

Fifteen or twenty years ago, sure, one's console options were dictated solely by one or two companies, but with personal computers like the Apple II and Commodore 64, things were much different.

For PC games, no prepackaged software industry existed to speak of. The best you got was a floppy disk and some mimeographed instructions, tastefully packaged in a Ziplock bag. The person ziplocking the software was likely the same person who designed and wrote the program and did the art and music.

There was an excitement present during, that time, a feeling that one was participating in something new and different. The truth is less romantic - a lot of that early software, frankly, sucked (there isn't a very large quality control department in a one-person shop). Still, it was rarely predictable.

Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

Text image of Yarouze with 2 controllers: "Some hardcore gamers may pick up Yarouze just to play other people's games."

With no established genres or gaming paradigms, your $10 Ziplock-encased game was as likely to contain a shooting game as it was a text-based game where you controlled truffle sniffing pigs. And if you didn't like a game, it usually wasn't too much of a stretch to either go ahead and modify the code of the game you just bought, or rewrite the same game in a style more to your liking.

As the industry grew and matured, computers became popular with people more interested in simply using them than programming them. Companies that started in bedrooms as hobbies, producing software for other hobbyists, grew and began producing software for non-hobbyists.

That was a good thing, because they started quality assurance departments, conducted focus group tests, and began to give gamers exactly what they wanted. There were some downsides to this (largely inevitable) process. As games grew in size and complexity, releasing a game became a larger financial risk (a game that takes a year to create costs a hell of a lot more to develop than a hack knocked together in a weekend). To ensure a good return on investment, most games released were in one of a few specialized genres, and innovation began to slow. Still, many hit games, like Peter Moleneuyeux's Populous, were still the product of one person or very small teams.

Then came Myst, and with it a flood of multimedia-equipped PC's. Despite Myst's merits (or lack thereof), it radically changed consumers' expectations of what a computer game should be, graphically. Point blank, expectations shot through the roof. Although a dedicated amateur might have a shareware hit, producing anything approaching commercial quality suddenly required far more dollars and time than most hobbyists had. This has only exacerbated the problem of decreased innovation. ID's Doom, released just before the "CD-ROM revolution," was perhaps the last title that was successfully produced "in the garage."

"Since CD-ROMs came in, the audience has demanded so much that you can't really innovate," says Jordan Mechner, creator of the classic Karateka and Prince of Persia titles. "To have a bright idea and follow it through to the point where it is a sellable game, you now need millions of dollars and a team of trained professionals." Understandably, companies are reluctant to spend millions of dollars on anything but sure things, in well-known genres. "The game industry has been paralyzed - it's really hard to be creative," laments Mechner.

Say what you want about how the old classics aren't what they're remembered to be, at least their designers were not afraid to try new things. Today, with the majority of video and computer games vigorously locked into a few genres, innovation in gameplay has largely been replaced by mere technological advances. To be sure, sometimes advances in technology can advance gameplay (WaveRace, and Tomb Raider would not have been possible two years ago), but Quake is not much more than what Doom would have been if Pentium 166's had existed in '93.

If the game industry is to avoid sliding into the same paradigm as TV (every year it's the same old rubbish, just with different actors), with any innovation or experimentation crushed by market pressures, it needs some kind of jump start, a way of bringing new designers into the mainstream, without being marginalized into the shareware ghetto or stuck being junior programmers on the latest Doom clone. Yarouze may very well be that jump start.

"This is one of the best things that's happened in a very long time," says programming evangelist and Earthworm Jim creator David Perry of Shiny Entertainment. "Creating a videogame requires passion, and passion is something that a lot of people have - but a lot of people with passion can't get anywhere near a development system and get through the rules and regs of making a game."

Industry veteran Eugene Jarvis, creator of Defender, Robotron, and Cruisin" USA, is equally enthusiastic. "It'll be wild - imagine linking up all these lone wolf designers over the net to create a huge meta project - if you can get any lone wolves to agree on anything. This is an awesome development."

No doubt. By enabling enthusiasts to create their own games, Sony has vastly lowered the barriers to entry for would-be developers. Also, it has created an environment in which new ideas, unrestrained by market pressures, can be tried and tested, the best of which may advance the state of the art of the industry.

Text under image of NYarouze kit: "Once you've pulled the system out of the box and removed the packaging, this is vhat your $750 (or so) buys you. The really cool bits - the PSX C libraries - are on the silver CD."

Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

"Reducing the cost of entry into the industry will bring people into it," said Mark Cerny, president of development at Universal. "The whole reason Disruptor exists is because an enthusiastic hobbyist could start development on 3DO, since it had cheap development hardware. We saw the prototype running on 3DO and agreed to fund development on PlayStation."

He continued, "What we'll see primarily is hobbyists creating purely passion-driven games with no consideration for commercial success. I think we'll see some great games we wouldn't have seen otherwise."

Despite enthusiasm from the developer community, skeptics may ask some questions about the true importance of Yarouze. Doesn't the possibility for independent, enthusiast development already exist on the PC? Other than Doom, what has the shareware world brought us, except for a myriad of lame shooters? Why should it be any different on PlayStation. In short, what's the big deal?

The answer to this question reveals, in large measure, just what is so exciting about the initiative as a whole, especially considering that most Yarouze members will have already tried their hands at game coding on the PC or Mac.

First, this is the first time that anyone will be able to develop for a console system without a significant cash outlay, which will give enthusiasts easy access to a single standard hardware platform. Instead of attempting to develop for a lowest common denominator of hardware (or worse, a Windows API), people will be able to concentrate on exploiting the PlayStation hardware as fully as possible.

The program libraries will enable people to get up to speed in complex 3D development far faster than they would be able to on a PC. The libraries will also aid more novice developers whose own 3D skills might be sub-par at first.

The Yarouze may not change the gaming world. But someone who gets their start on Yarouze might.

Also significant is the support level from Sony and fellow Yarouze members that will be available on the website. For the first time, hobbyist game developers will have someplace official to go to get information on issues. It is also expected that the website will, as it has done in Japan, become a repository for source code that will enable faster learning of just how to program the system. The importance of support from Sony, particularly for novices, cannot be overstated.

Text under image of 4 screen shots: "A shot from the Yarouze startup screen (top left), and more shots of nearly complete games. The Japanese Yarouze site is also home to many PS-X demos and hacks."

According to Will Botti of Black Ops, "In a lot of ways, PlayStation's success is directiy related to the caliber of Sony's 'teachers' - the staff at SCEI and SCEA - and their 'teaching materials' - PlayStation development kits and artist/sound tools." With Sony extending this level of support to include novices, software produced for Yarouze may well outstrip the quality of comparable PC software.

Even the 3.5MB limit will probably not be too much of a factor - remember, before the advent of CD-based systems, 3.5MB was considered quite a lot of storage space. "By limiting it to 2MB [main system RAM]," says Eugene Jarvis, "the focus needs to be on gameplay - not graphics."

Most importantly. though, the PlayStation provides a new horizon for enthusiast level programmers to explore and hack around in - a new world to conquer, exploit, and make their own, which is where most of the fun of programming, particularly at the hobbyist level, comes from.

Of course, the biggest benefit of the crossover between PC and Yarouze enthusiast developers will not be for them, but rather from them. For the first time, we will see innovative, hobbyist level development on the consoles. Game ideas that would never fly as commercial titles, but which may work far better on console than on PC, can now be implemented and enjoyed by other Yarouze owners.

Another exciting element about the system is that, unlike commercial PlayStation software, no approval process exists - anything goes. If you want to do Lemonade Stand on the system - go for it. "This is totally against the conventional wisdom that product must be controlled," says Jarvis, "It's neat to give access to anyone to do anything."

Don't expect the system to sell solely to programmers, either. In Japan, a large number of artists and designers have also purchased Yarouze, looking to team up with programmers to create games. Next Generation also expects some hardcore gamers to get Yarouze simply to play the games that others have created - as well as Japanese and European games (the black PlayStation has no teritorrial lockout).

The Yarouze system opens up a totally new range of possibilities for users, and has the potential to greatly invigorate the software industry as a whole.

So what does Sony, get out of it? "If Yarouze were to be judged on marketability alone, I would say it's going to be a a big flop," says Will Botti. "Kids want to play games, not program them. I don't see Yarouze as a big profit center. But if we look deeper, we can see the reasoning behind Ken Kutaragi and Terry Tokunaka's plans for the system. In the same way that the extensive developer support helped endear top game designers to the platform, I see Yarouze as a way to endear the younger generation of hackers/game enthusiasts to Sony's PlayStation methodology: "Code in C, use our tools, don't reinvent the wheel, focus on games, not the friggin' video drivers, and so on."

In short. Yarouze will let enthusiasts concentrate on creating games, instead of being bogged down in the minutiae of programming for an OS like Windows that must also be able to run printer drivers and screensavers.

Ultimately, Yarouze may not change the videogaming world. But it could be someone who gets their start on Yarouze that does. And that's why it's so important.

Out of box experience.

So what do you get in the Yarouze box? Here's the official rundown of all the bits and pieces, plus all the optional extras you'll want to make full use of the system.

Yarouze comes with everything you need to make software for PlayStation.

The Yarouze system itself is almost identical to a standard PlayStation, with the exception of different boot ROMS, the lack of a territorial lockout, and a radically different encryption scheme. (And. of course, it's black.) It differs from a professional level development system in that it has less RAM (just the standard 2MB main memory that comes with every PlayStation, and no extra RAM for debugging), and it doesn't have a CD-ROM emulator or come on a PC board.

Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

Yarouze will come with a PC CD-ROM as well as a key disc for the PlayStation, and some manuals. The manuals are reference guides for the libraries and some PlayStation specific information, but if you're not a programmer now, don't get your hopes up - they aren't going to teach you C. Assuming you already program, though, you'll find them a well laid out guide to getting started with Yarouze development. On the PC CD-ROM will be C language tools, libraries and possibly code examples, although that was not determined at press time.

The standard tools supplied include the GNU Tool Chain, a Compiler Assembler, Linker, and GDB debugger. These are all "pretty direct ports of the existing Free Software Foundation tools," says Bill Rehbock , VP of R&D at SCEA. "They are a great starting point because they exist in some form for just about every platform and microprocessor in the world and most programmers are reasonably familiar with them."

Yarouze members will also receive utilities that enable conversion of standard audio and graphic files to PlayStation's format. It is expected that several third parties will also include cut down or trial versions of their software: Expect at least a fully working demo version of one 3D package, as well as a texture-map editing utility.

Text under image of Yarouze peripherals: The serial cable (left) connects your PC to the black PlayStation, but not (surprisingly), through the standard expansion port. The access card dongle (right), thwarts pirates."

Also on the CD will be a nearly full compliment of the famous PlayStation development libraries. What's missing? First. some low-level model data support. which would make it pretty difficult to do something like Tekken or Toshiden right now. This support may be added at a later date if there is enough user demand. According to Rehbock, though, "the primary functions that are missing relate to CD access. The system needs to have our Yarouze CD in the black PlayStation itself to work. and we don't allow user-created CDs to be read. Also, the libraries are set up to be more akin to run-time libraries instead of getting compiled in with the user's code. This reduces the transfer time to the PlayStation when the user is debugging or wants to play the game."

Because Yarouze needs to be pirate-proof, a special key disc and a hardware dongle that fits in memory port 1 are required when running programs that were loaded from a PC (obviously. the key disc is not necessary to run standard software in the black PlayStation). This limits the available space for programs to 2MB main system RAM. as well as the 1 MB VRAM and 512K sound RAM. Users will also not be able to read from the PC hard drive while running their programs.

In addition to preventing piracy. this means that games cannot be very large, as well as ensuring that the Yarouze program will not compete with the professional development kit.

However. a limit of 2MB RAM is not as bad as it may at first seem. First, quite a lot can be done in just 2MB RAM - not only can an extremely robust game engine run, but a complete game can be executed in RAM as well. Ridge Racer fits entirely within this 2MB limit, as would a single level of WarHawk or Twisted Metal. In short. 2MB is more than enough space in which to make a game engine and a fairly robust game - Yarouze titles will not be as restricted as the 2MB limit may imply to the casual observer.

Also, and more importantly, the only reason anyone would ever say that 2MB RAM is small in the first place is because developers have been spoiled over the past few years. Not so long ago, developers were creating classic games in 16K. Even given the overhead that coding in C language (versus assembly) adds, anyone who says they simply cannot create a good game or game engine in 2MB must be a very sloppy programmer.

Granted. graphics. particularly textures, may suffer with only 2MB main RAM, but this will force hobbyists to focus on the most important part of a game, the actual gameplay. Considering the most exciting aspect of the Yarouze program is the potential for novel, innovative games. a lack of graphic sophistication should not be that problematic.

Probably a more signifigant barrier to developers will not be the RAM limits, but the tools that come with the system. This is bare bones C and debugging folks, and anyone who has ever used a well-integrated development environment is unlikely to be thrilled by the prospect of using some of the tools supplied for Yarouze by Sony.

Enter Metrowerks, creators of the award-winning CodeWarrior C development environment, Metrowerks ( came to fame with a series of PowerPC native development environments for the Mac. In October, Metrowerks released a version of CodeWarrior for PlayStation that runs on Mac or PC.

CodeWarrior for PlayStation costs $499, but it features such a nice feature set and development environment that any Yarouze member who can afford it should buy a copy. It features an integrated development environment, GUI project manager, file-format converters built directly into the project manager, and drag-and-drop editing (as well, of course. as a full NIST certified ANSI C compiler, and a C++ compiler that is in track with the emerging ANSI/ISO standard).

If you plan on doing any serious artwork at all. you'll also want Adobe's Photoshop and probably some 3D app, too, although the 3D demo included on the CD may be enough. A sound utility may also be desirable.

Despite the RAM limitations, Yarouze is easily the best console development system deal of all time. even if most users will need to tack on an additional $500 for CodeWarrior for PlayStation.

Since the dawn of video and computer games. people have been saying. "I could do a better job than that." Now, through an innovative program that got its start in R&D, not the marketing department. Sony has given gamers a relatively easy and low cost way to prove it.

In Japan. Yarouze-authored software has run the gamut from shooting games to Othello to particle generator demos. There have also been memory card utilities written (so people can trade game saves over the Internet). Probably the most impressive "utility" is a hardware emulator for a 16-bit console system! The point is. gamers in Japan are already creating programs with Yarouze that Sony never expected.

What kind of games will hobbyists and enthusiasts in the U.S. make? That's up to you, but one thing is clear: Sony has delivered its promise of bringing the power of the PlayStation to the people.

The company line

It's great for gamers, but what is Sony getting from Yarouze? Next Generation went to Sony Computer Entertainment America's Foster City headquarters to find out. Next Generation spoke to Sony VP of Third Party and R&D, Phil Harrison, VP of Marketing Andrew House, and VP of R&D Bill Rehbock to get Sony's perspective on Yarouze.

Next Gen: Explain the reasoning behind the system.

Phil Harrison: Philosophically, videogame systems are closed systems that don't allow the consumer to play around and do things with the software. And so you could argue that the last time the consumer has been able to do that was with the Commodore 64 and the Apple II-GS, which means that there is a whole generation of consumers who have an interest in getting involved in the sort of gritty side of development but can't do it.

Next Gen: Well, you can on the PC...

Phil Harrison: But the PC is costly and complicated and is a moving target, so your average consumer is going to find it very difficult to get involved with. One of the reasons for producing this program was to bring back the good old days of home development - the idea of hobby development, of two friends in the garage or in the spare room coming up with the next Boulderdash. Obviously, there are huge benefits subsequent to that, namely that the industry gets a whole load of newly trained PlayStation programmers who are moving into the thirdparty community or even working for us.

Next Gen: Do you realistically expect that the next Boulderdash, or Doom, will come out of a Yarouze equipped garage?

Phil Harrison: Well, 'Why not?' is, I guess, the answer to that! If you look at some of the seminal games of all time, they are one-man enterprises. From Peter Molyneux sitting on his own developing Populous to Will Wright's Sim City or Sid Meier's Civilization, you know, these were all one-man enterprises. So why shouldn't the next great game be developed in this way?

Next Gen: And of course, Sony will have the exclusive rights to Yarouze developed games.

Phil Harrison: Well, not necessarily. We can't deny that that's an opportunity for us. But similarly, there is opportunity for the third-party software companies to start working with these people as well. And yet, if we see the next Sim City or the next Populous, we're going to be falling over ourselves to work with these people and to help make the game into a fully-fledged commercial product. But that's not the only reason why we are doing this.

There is a whole other business model out there for people to make money from perhaps getting involved with a compilation disk that we would do as a 'best of' from this program. I guess you could also call Yarouze job training - so people can learn enough to go get a job at some hot startup company and make their millions on the stock market ten years from now.

Next Gen: Just how big do you estimate the demand for Yarouze will be in terms of unit sales?

Phil Harrison: No idea, nor does it matter. The infrastructure to support one user or 20,000 is exactly the same. This is not PlayStation 2. This is not a mass-market consumer proposition. But it is a highly strategic initiative that reaps the reward three years down the line. It does not really matter how big it is.

Text under image of faces: "From top to bottom, Sony's Andrew House, Bill Rehbock, and Phil Harrison."

Next Gen: What's the best-case scenario for Yarouze?

Phil Harrison: I think the best thing would be a situation where Next Generation reviews a game, you give it a fantastic score and in interviewing the programmer, he confesses that this game actually started out when he was a member of the development community and he took it to XYZ company and they said, 'This is great. Here's a job. Come work as part of a team and build your masterpiece into a fully-fledged consumer product.' That would be the dream.

I think that there is another benefit or another dream, which would be that there are legions of programmers coming into the marketplace creatively and technically trained on PlayStation. Obviously, it benefits our thirdparty programme for many, many years to come. So it's kind of like an insurance policy in that way.

In a perverse way, I want to see code listings in Next Generation. Typing in stuff from magazines. That's the same concept. I got my start in videogames by typing in listing of games from magazines. I learned to program by screwing around with them and saying, 'This doesn't work, but what about this?' It would be great to see code examples in little routines printed in magazines.

Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

Next Gen: Why call it Yarouze?

Andrew House: It's a Japanese slang expression for 'Let's do it!' it was a tagline used for just about everything in the early PlayStation marketing - "1,000,000 units? Yarouze!".

Phil Harrison: I think it embodies the creative empowerment that this program is all about, which is, 'Okay, Mr Gameplayer, you've always sat at home and said, 'I could do better than that.' You know, 'This game sucks, I know I could do better than that.'. We're saying, 'Well, here you are, go do it. Yarouze!'

Next Gen: Will SCEA be pursuing educational opportunities with Yarouze?

Phil Harrison: Oh yes, absolutely. A logical outlet for this product is into computer graphics and computer science courses at varying educational levels, be it the master's degree level or moving down to vocational training and technical colleges. We'll have a mechanism for government and educational establishments to buy systems.

Next Gen: How much will Yarouze change the impression of PlayStation in the eyes of the man on the street - perhaps someone who has no intention of ever actually buying one?

Andrew House: I think that it will certainly enhance the overall brand image of PlayStation. I think that it lends an air of creativity to the platform. It obviously shows that we are forward-looking and that we are setting up plans for the future. I think there is a lot of positive impact to be had.

I also think that there will be significant interest from general consumers as to what's developed there and I think that you create a very positive spiral because you have people who are creating their own stuff and want other people to look at it and you'll have a significant number of interested consumers who will be very keen to see how it's emerging.

Phil Harrison: I think that knowing that this particular game was created by 'one of us' has some appeal. Empowerment is a very compelling hook for our target consumer. And so knowing that you can do this with a PlayStation, even if you yourself are not going to it or don't have the skills or the inclination, just knowing that PlayStation is capable of this, is a very compelling part of the brand ethos, the thing that makes PlayStation what it is. And I think that will become stronger as time goes on.

Bill Rehbock: The other thing that you are going to see is that people will be seeing the realisation of their wishes. If a guy is up on a website saying, 'Boy, it would be really cool if a game like X existed,' who's more likely to pick up on it and do it, Virgin or a Yarouze member? No Yarouze member is going to say, 'Okay, we'll get a focus group to check it Out, and run it past the Midwest sales manager.' They'll just do it and upload it to the website.

Next Gen: How do you expect distribution and creation to work?

Phil Harrison: I think that what we are expecting to see is that along with the executable program, the source code goes up as well. And a lot of people will say, 'This is how I did it.' Then I expect two or three people to band together and say, 'Let's work on a masterpiece. You do this section of the game, and we will do this bit, and my mate down at USC is going to do the graphics.'

Bill Rehbock: One thing that we have seen in Japan is that we have members who are not programmers or artists but designers who have good ideas. They get together with the programmers and artists and say, 'Here is this diamond in the rough, but it'd be really cool if you did this and this and this.' Then someone else says, 'You know that programmer art really sucks,' and contributes art to it. So we have these titles that are in incubation, that have scattered development members and wow - it's 1975 all over again.

Phil Harrison: Yarouze is almost the perfect Internet application in that respect. You can work with people you've never met in different countries, where you never have any realtime interaction with them. I think that's the collective ideal of this, and it's something which is completely out of our control. And that's the appeal of it! There are no content guidelines, there's no approval process, there is no requirement that the product fulfil certain taste or commercial requirements. Because this is not a retail program. Full products going onto shelves are sensitive to the dynamics of the marketplace, because there are only so many linear feet of shelf space in stores. But with this, the shelf space is infinite, It's virtual shelf space. So people can go and do what they like, and they don't even have to be games. They don't just have to be for a typical target demographic. They can be all kinds of weird and wonderful things, and that's part of the appeal - what are these people going to come up with?

Next Gen: What about the RAM? Is 2Mb enough to create a great title in?

Phil Harrison: Well it's 3.5 if you include the 1Mb of VRAM and half a meg of sound RAM. So that's a lot if you think that Ridge Racer is the benchmark. Most users don't have a CD-ROM burner and an SGI to create 15-minute rendered intros, so we don't think it's a problem. It also puts the focus on the idea rather than the production. On commercial software, where you're charging 50 bucks for the product, the focus is on the production values and production quality to justify the price. This doesn't have those kind of commercial dynamics applied to it. And so you can have a really really simple idea that would never stack up on a store shelf. But it is an absolutely boiled-down, refined, well-formed concept. One of the things we will do is look at these pure concepts and evaluate them and go, 'Wow that would make a fantastic product', and work with the creator to turn it into something great.

Tips from the Pros

Will Botti

  • Lead Programmer, Black Ops.
  • Key Titles: Black Dawn, Agile Warrior, Robocop, versus Terminator.
  • Will Botti has been programming games since he was in the fifth grade.
Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

"If you can't make a game with the tools that Sony provides, you're an idiot and don't belong in the business"

Ten things a 3D shooter should include:

1) Easy controls that perform hard-to-do maneuvers. - In Black Dawn, controlling your angle of attack is easy - just up or down on the D-pad. In a real chopper, you'd need to worry about collective, blade pitch, wind, and so on. Easier is generally better.

2) Ability to destroy entire environments. - In Agile Warrior, many gamers really enjoyed being able to deform the environment and create canyons through mountains. Not realistic, but who gives a shit?

3) Secret stuff. - People love secrets, be they hidden areas or hidden powerups. Secrets help give the joy of discovery, and the power of that knowledge. Try playing a Quake deathmatch with someone who knows all the secret areas - you're gonna get waxed.

4) Large, dynamic 3D explosions. - 3D games should have 3D explosions.

5) Large, high-detail onscreen objects. - In 2D fighting games, it was the "big sprite" that ruled the day. Zangief filled our screens and we loved it. Just because games are in 3D and a lot of the action may be ‘into' the screen doesn't mean things have to be small. Make 'em big.

6) Vectored bullets. - Bullets fire from the enemies' position and "vector" or move towards the player. Sounds simple, but lots of games miss the "avoidathon" gameplay that vector bullets provide.

7) Detailed collision between objects. - Compare two game engines - Tekken vs. Toshinden. The collision in Tekken is superior, so the Tekken player is more empowered. Result? Read the sales reports and see!

8) Damage by degrees. - The more levels of damage an object has, the more realistic / immersive it is. Good examples are the awesome submersible-cracking in Earthworm Jim, or the player ship in Warhawk. When a player gets hit in a 3D game, you should: show a "ping" animation (bullet sparks), deform the geometry of the model, change the texture map to destroyed state, or reduce the controllability of the player vehicle (carefully). Remember, though, there's a fine line between fun and frustration.

9) Payoff for advancement. - Too many games end with a static screen. Give the player a real reward. The best example is in Tekken 2.

10) Two-player option. - If possible, make the game two-player. I'll take playing against someone in the same room over playing the computer or even someone on the Internet any day! I want to see my opponent react and get pissed, and then try to get even!

Dave Perry

  • President, Shiny Entertainment.
  • Key Titles: Earthworm Jim, Aladdin, Cool Spot, wild Nincs, Global Gladiators, MDK.
  • Dave Perry got his start writing game program listings for videogame magazines.
Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

"This is one of the best things that's happened in a very long time"

Ten tips for game programming novices

1) Starting: Challenge yourself and don't stop till you work it out. Getting a program that you designed to work is like winning a game (the same sort of feeling). You will get very frustrated, but frustration is good, because it is such a relief to get that damn thing working.

2) Learning: Go straight to the biggest bookstore you can possibly find. A good reference book can fix problems very quickly when you are working late. (Also use the Internet.)

3) Gameplay: Don't ever take control away from the joypad / keyboard unless your really want to piss off the player.

4) Gameplay: When you press jump, make him jump. Fight animators or anyone who tries to get you to do anything else. Instant response is key.

5) Personal: One of my best tricks is to make every damn possible thing random. If something repeats (for example if your character looks left and right) don't make it ping-pong in perfect timing like a metronome. Always slip in randomness so that something that does repeat never looks the same twice. Nothing in your game should move to a "beat."

6) Technical: Tables are the fastest way to program just about everything. If I have a bird that is flying and it randomly decides to swoop down, should I do a bunch of math to pick a random number? Or should I just grab the next value from a previously created table?. Your code grabs a value each time it wants a random number, if the number is greater than one hundred (> 100), then make the bird swoop. It's as simple as that. When your program gets to the end of the table make it go back to the start. (No gamer will notice that the random numbers are being used again! -That's the beauty of it.)

7) Psychology: The best bit of a video game is winning. When a player does well, pat him on the head. It is much more important than you probably think. If he obviously screwed up, make him feel it was his mistake. This will make him think that with another go he will win. The player should always blame himself, not the game for failure.

8) Competition: Speed! If you can work out a way to get the screen being updated 60 times a second and someone else can only get 4 times a second, you have totally kicked his ass. This is another enjoyable part of programming. Speed comes from being clever and not doing things that other programmers do because you know that gamers won't notice. The quickest way to a gamers heart is to give him something smooth and sexy.

9) Business: If you want a job, make a great demo, send it to every publisher and team you would like to work for. Tell them that you have sent it to every other publisher and team. This means if they like it, they will move very, very fast. Good people are very hard to find, so if you are great, then apply for a job through our web page:

10) Long-term: Sure, learn C to start. But never, never, ignore assembly language, it will never, go away. Somebody somewhere will always use assembly language to make you look slow. At Shiny, our 3D games use really advanced RISC assembly code and heavily optimized Pentium assembly language. We cannot afford to be beaten. It should be your long-term goal too, and if you master these skills there is no team in the world that won't want you.

Jordan Mechner.

  • President, Smoking Car Productions.
  • Key Titles: Karateka, Prince of Persia, Last Express.
  • John Eaton, Smoking Car's "business guy" added tips of his own at the end of Jordan's.
Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

"A story is a series of events - a game is a series of actions. Actions not taken by the player don't count as actions."

Ten things to do to do to ensure a more playable game:

1) The only significant actions are those that affect the player's ability to perform future actions. Everything else is bells and whistles.

2) Make a list of all the actions that the player can perform in the game, take a cold hard look at it and decide if it sounds like fun to you. If the list is boring, the game probably will be too.

3) In each situation ask yourself: What are the possible actions the player can take? If there are only two, it's weak. If there's only one, it's not even action. If a non-interactive sequence shows the player's character sneak into the compound, clobber a guard and put on his uniform, the player's action is "Watch non-interactive sequence." Giving the player one chance to click to clobber the guard or die isn't much better.

4) Design a clear and simple interface. The primary task of the interface is to present the player with a choice of the available actions at each moment and to provide instant feedback when the player makes a choice.

5) The player needs a goal at all times, even if it is a mistaken one. If there is nothing he wishes to accomplish, he will soon get bored, even if the game is rich with graphics and sound.

6) The more the player feels that the events of the game are being caused by his or her own actions, the better - even when it is an illusion.

7) Analyze the events of the story in terms of their effect on the player's goals. Anything that moves him closer to or further away from a goal, or gives him a new goal, is part of the game.

8) The longer the player plays without a break, the more we build up his sense of the reality of the world. Any time he dies or has to restart from a saved game, the spell is broken. Alternative paths, recoverable errors, multiple solutions to the same problem, missed opportunities that can be made up later, are all good.

9) Don't introduce gratuitous obstacles just to create a puzzle. All plot twists should mean something for the story. If the game requires the player to drive somewhere, don't also require him to fill up his tank with gas first - unless maybe the tank was deliberately drained by an opponent...

10) As the player moves through the game, he should always have the feeling that he is passing up potentially interesting avenues of exploration. The perfect outcome is for him to win the game having done 95% of what there is to do, but left with the feeling that there must be another 50% he missed.

John Eaton's "Top Four Tips for Business"

1) Get yourself a good intellectual property lawyer who has experience in the industry.

2) Make sure you haven't given away any rights except those specified in the contract.

3) Be sure to work with a publisher that's not going to go bankrupt.

4) Take the budget, triple it, then add $1 million. Double your schedule, then add 6 months.

Mark Cerny.

  • President of Product Development, Universal.
  • Key Titles: Marble Madness, Sonic 2, Crash Bandicoot.
  • Cerny completed Marble Madness when he was only 17. Think about that.
Click to open hi-res image on new browser.

"What is the videogame equivalent of the black and white art movie? We're going to get to see."

Ten tips for making money from your Yarouze game:

1) From time to time, invite PlayStation owners over to play your game. - There are many things that can be learned by watching them play, the biggest being if they are having fun!

2) Keep the rules of the game simple. - Ideally, first-time players should understand and enjoy the game without instructions.

3) Make sure the player doesn't get "stuck in a rut". - If the difficulty progression of the game is not smooth, players will become stuck at a certain point (again, inviting PlayStation owners over to play the game will help).

4) If the game is a genre game, pay attention to the unwritten rules of the genre. - For example, while there may not be abstract reasons why a certain controller scheme is best, there are definitely conventions. If you are doing an action game with a jump, survey the successful games in the genre to see if there is a button that is always used.

5) Use assembly language to speed your frame rate. - This will help you compete with other games in the category.

6) Put in music, even if it's temporary. - This will help even a prototype game feel alive!

7) Take it as far as you can before you start to look for a publisher. - The farther a game is towards completion, the better your negotiating position.

8) Realize your (probably) can't take it all the way. - For example, professional sound effects and music costing $50,000 will make the final product much more slick, but you won't have the resources to do this until you've lined up a production deal. The most important thing to complete is the gameplay.

9) Pick your publisher carefully. - Is this a company that puts out games you think are good? Is it stable?

10) Bet on your success. - If it is possible to forgo some money early on, in return for big money later on, do it!

End of article.

Email Thread: Yaroze Capabilities 1997

The following email thread was created and uploaded to the SCEA Net Yaroze server on Friday, the 1st of August 1997, by Matthew Hulett. Email addresses have been removed.

From Matthew Hulett on July, 17th 1997 09:16:36 AM

To: Michael Fulton
Subject: Yaroze Capabilities


I wasn't quite sure who I could ask, but you are called the 'guru', and besides, that picture on the website just cries out for e-mail. I'm a Yaroze member, my name is Matt. I just have one simple question that could require a little elaboration. I am a novice to all this, so please, have mercy.

I am trying to get a grip on just what this little bugger can or cannot do in conjuncture with CodeWarrior. It has now been made clear to me that C++ is disabled and not to reappear until future versions (after 2.0) are released. Oh well, I can wait, and besides, when I read about the best games being made for Playstation, programmers say they first write the game in C, optimize the code, and then if they don't approve of the games performance, they translate parts of or the entire game engine into assembler.

I comprehend all this to a point, but it matters because it affects self-educational decisions I will make.

Here's the thing: Metrowerks informed me that while I can do regular MIPS inline assembler, unfortunately Sony (???) disabled inline assembler for the graphics coprocessor. Huh?

The 3.5 Meg limitation is always in the back of my mind, was this another handicap placed on Yaroze and Yarozers so we can't really compete with the pros? How serious a handicap is this to a developer? I'm asking questions about a process I haven't learned yet, my questions aren't that focused or clear. O.k., this is getting too long: In one short paragraph, would you, as a professional, tell me, the novice, what it means in terms of performance to be able to use inline assembler for the MIPS but not for the GPU.

Hey, and if you are too busy, please, blow me off, but just give me a name of someone somewhere who could evaluate this newly discovered handicap for me. I don't want to spend two years of my life learning limited skills to achieve uncompetitive mediocre results.

Thanks, Matthew Hulett

P.S.- While I'm on the topic, are there any other unadvertised performance limitations on the Yaroze? P.S.S.- Is Sony planning to make the new graphics libraries with great lightsourcing I keep reading about available for Yarozers?

From: Michael Fulton (date and time unknown)

To: Matthew Hulett
Subject: Re: Yaroze Capabilities

A quick response now and possibly a more detailed one in a few days when I have more time. In general, however, you'll get better results asking your questions in the Yaroze newsgroups.

First of all, many PlayStation games are written in C++. It's the preferences of the developers. C++ does not have significantly different performance from C, provided you're not using someone else's canned class libraries. Of course, writing in assembler is always the way to get the smallest and fastest possible code.

I have no information about C++ being disabled in CodeWarrior. You'd have to ask Metrowerks. As far as "inline assembler for the graphics processor" goes, there is no such thing for the GPU. The GPU is not a coprocessor in that sense. It is a chip peripheral, not a coprocessor. One sets registers to make it do stuff, it does not run code. You're thinking of the GTE, which does 3d math calculations. Low level information on the GTE that would allow you to program it directly is not included with the Yaroze package. Yaroze programmers are expected to use the supplied libraries to access the GTE.

It is simply not possible to calculate how much difference you get from programming the GTE in assembly instead of using the libraries. Potentially the difference is great, and in reality it could be zero. It depends on how well you do it and how well you understand the system.

I don't know what you mean by "the 3.5mb limitation". That's how much RAM is contained in a PlayStation. Aside from not being able to do CD access and having to give up a chunk of memory to the Yaroze libraries, it's the same as regular developers. Keep in mind you can read data from the PC instead of from CD.


From: Matthew Hulett on July, 23rd 1997 10:31:22 PM

To: Michael Fulton
Subject: Re: Yaroze Capabilities


Thank you for your quite through response to my inquiry. You have no idea the emotion of sheer excitement I experienced when it sank in that I can stream data in and out of the Yaroze. Wow!!! Any game I've dreamed of making is no longer out of my reach.

I got the idea that I couldn't stream data from the rather prominent article that appeared in NEXT GENERATION about Yaroze in January that stated flat out in two or three paragraphs that the junior kit limited program size to 3.5 Megs, that the whole program had to be loaded, and they even mentioned that this wasn't too bad because programmers are spoiled with gobs of memory and that the original RIDGE RACER could still be done within the limitations. I swear to god, just look at pg.42 in January's issue. Your fearless leader Bill Rehbock was interviewed for the article and was directly asked about the memory limitation also.

I am sort-of shocked to find out that all this information is inaccurate. In addition, the SCEA FAQ at the Metrowerks website states that no function calls for streaming audio data are provided, but that the individual could certainly write and utilize such functions if he chose to do so. In that very same FAQ, the SCEA respondent stated that not being able to use C++ with Yaroze shouldn't really matter because of the imaginary memory restriction, C++ takes up more memory and for those whom have memory limitations, C is the way to go. The only doubt I ever experienced was when I read somewheres that I could use CodeWarrior to emulate a CD-ROM. I'll take your word for it, I certainly hope and believe you are correct.

Eric Hunt at Metrowerks fields all questions about their Yaroze product.

I won't bother you with our exchanges, but the bottom line was that he stated that Sony has officially stated that they do not support C++ for Playstation. He stated that it was included but disabled on version 1.7, that they had problems with the MIPS I won't elaborate. In version 2.0 which came out on June 16th, it is not included. Eric states that C++ is planned to be reinstituted in future versions in an unsupported state. When I asked him about inline assembler capabilities, he stated flat out that, "Sony has disabled inline assembler for the graphics processor..." To me, he seems to mean the GPU, but once again I'll take your word that he means the GTE.

Trust me, I was very careful to review all these sources before I wasted your time with false memories and inaccuracies. I appreciate that you would consider taking the time to respond to my first letter in even greater detail, but it would be even more helpful to me if you could just answer a few residual questions I have because I will definitely be writing about all of this stuff on my website:

1) Are function calls for streaming data (audio or otherwise) from the PC to the Yaroze provided with the kit, or do Yarozers have to create these functions?

2) I would like to learn C++, if for no other reason than the fact you state that many game programmers prefer it. Sony promoted CodeWarrior in the Yaroze package, but if it can't do C++, what other options are there for Yarozers? What software are the pros using to do C++? I am also aware that CodeWarrior is the only option for Mac users, so are they just stuck waiting? (Not a problem for me, I have a Packard Bell) I promise, no more time-consuming questions.

Thank you, Matthew Hulett

From Michael Fulton on July, 26th 1997 07:47:28

To: Matthew Hulett
Subject: Re: Yaroze Capabilities

First of all, I would not categorize the information from the NEXT GEN article as inaccurate. It is very accurate from what I remember, but you have to keep the information in the proper context. For example, EVERYBODY writing for the PlayStation is limited to 2mb of main RAM, 1mb of Video RAM, and 0.5mb of SPU (sound) RAM. That's a total of 3.5mb, but remember that 1.5mb is designated for specific purposes. And keep in mind that Yaroze members have to give up about 0.5mb of main RAM to the Yaroze libraries and runtime code which must be loaded at all times. So Yaroze members have 3.0mb, not 3.5mb. If the NEXT-GEN article really says 3.5mb instead of 3.0mb, I imagine someone just forgot to consider the 0.5mb that must be set aside for the Yaroze runtime code and libraries.

But treating this as a limitation is the issue. Commercial developers can load new information from their CD on the fly as needed, because the CD-ROM transfers data reasonably quickly at 300 kb per second, and occupies a minimum of the R3000 CPU's time in the process.

Yaroze programmers can load new data as needed over the Yaroze -> PC serial cable, but this is not really a practical thing to do during gameplay. The transfer rate is simply not high enough since you're usually limited by the PC end to about 115 kbits per second, or less than 1 / 20th of the transfer rate of a double-speed CD-ROM. And maintaining that sort of transfer rate also sucks down a fair amount of the R3000's bandwidth on the PlayStation end because the serial transfer is not automated the same way as a CD transfer.

So, while this method is suitable for loading new level data while the user looks at a "Loading" screen, you shouldn't expect to use it for streaming data during ongoing gameplay. With that in mind, one could say there is a 3.0mb limit on the size of your Yaroze game code and data *WHILE GAMEPLAY IS GOING ON*.

It may help to keep things in the proper context if you think of different levels of a game as actually being separate games which are loaded and played in succession, one after the other.

As far as C++ goes, you were asking me about METROWERKS CODEWARRIOR, and I responded accordingly. If you had been asking about the compiler which SONY includes in the Yaroze system, I would have said straight out that C++ is not supported. I did not know that Metrowerks had gone so far as to disable C++ in Codewarrior.

The compiler that we supply with the commercial developer's kit is not the same as the one in the Yaroze package, and it fully supports C++. However, Sony does not officially support this feature. The reason has to do with the PlayStation-specific libraries, support files, and C include files, but not the compiler itself.

Just because it's not "officially" supported that doesn't mean some developers aren't going to go ahead and use C++ anyway, and some do. If you're not using someone else's canned C++ libraries, the extra overhead of C++ is potentially only a little greater than for standard C, and then only if you're using the C++ features like class inheritance, virtual base classes, operator overloading, inline functions, etc. It's true that C++ has a reputation as a memory hog, but more often than not that's because of the use of canned libraries, or because the programmer didn't know how to design things efficiently. The games in C++ on the PlayStation that I've seen have generally been quite well done.

As far as inline assembler for the GTE goes, since no information for the GTE has been released to Yaroze members, there's no reason for Codewarrior to support it in the Yaroze version, right? But as far as it being disabled goes, I think it's more along the lines of "Sony asked Metrowerks to disable that feature for the Yaroze version". We have no current plans to release the low-level information to Yaroze members, but I don't know if that will change in the future. So far we haven't seen many programs that more than barely scratch the surface of the existing libraries, so it's not really a pressing issue.

Also, referring to the GTE as "the graphics processor" is a common thing. GTE stands for "Graphic Transform Engine" and it handles 3D math operations. It's implemented as a coprocessor to the R3000 and is accessed via assembly language instructions more or less the same way as the R3000 is accessed. So in that sense, it certainly can be described as "the graphics processor". But the actual drawing is done by the GPU, which is actually a chip-based peripheral and not a coprocessor in the strict sense. One does not write code for the GPU; you set the registers (actually the library calls set the registers) to do the desired operation and it does it, generating an interrupt when finished.

The concept of streaming audio data as it applies to PlayStation does not refer specifically to loading data from the CD, although that can be part of the process. What it's talking about is downloading audio data from main RAM to sound RAM on the fly as the sound is being played. This can be done to download sound data that is not maintained in SPU RAM for whatever reason. This could include sound data being loaded on the fly from the CD, but that's not always going to be the case.

Streaming audio calls are not part of the Yaroze system. In fact, support for this has only recently been added to the libraries that commercial developers use.

Mike @ SCEA

End of email thread.

5 comments on "Next Gen 25-Videogame school and build a better game"

  • mgarcia: 2021-05-25 05:18 +0200
    Some of my thoughts regarding this after having gone through it a few times...

    "... people will be able to concentrate on exploiting the PlayStation hardware as fully as possible."

    No, Net Yaroze wasn't about hardware "exploitation", it wasn't about low level performance, the opposite, using a simple and high level (blackbox) SDK.

    But yes, to get something good using LIBGS, you definitely had to 'exploit' it!

    I think Dave Perry's tip on the random table is great! :)

    There's some info about talking to publishers in both articles here, but for more info, I transcribed a few articles about publishers from gamedev magazine etc:
  • qobol: 2021-05-30 17:43 +0200
    This reminds me of Andreas Schrattenecker's tutorials (_andreas) where he explained how to get rid of blinking polygons. It could have been implemented out of the box, but you had to code it for yourself instead.
  • mgarcia: 2021-06-05 06:30 +0200
    I saw his research, he definitely tried pushing the 3D libGS!

    TBH, I still don't know what he was talking about re the blinking triangle, unless he's sorting individual TMD's, which could be the case because he did an interesting mipmap research.

    I think that was a huge problem with Net Yaroze, it's strength (high level 3D and 2D) were seen as uncool back then, everyone wanted to make something impressive, not something that was simple and fun....

    But, I think the main idea of the 3D TMD obj's was KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid), single objects that you would just pass to the GTE and GPU, like objects in VRAM today.

    From my tests, the less draw calls and the more the GTE and GPU does in the background, the better performance.

    It was struggling to render a few textured and fogged quads (like clone), in the next video, I just threw a whole level in a single TMD, and it was like a miracle! lol

    In hindsight, it makes sense not to even try and use libGS 3D Obj's as individual quads/tris, but I guess that's what everyone at the time, wanted to do and the thought of starting at the object level was seen as 'novel' and 'slow'.

    But nowadays this is flipped, most 'indies' just want to use exported 3D objects, in high level engines.... how times have changed! lol
  • qobol: 2021-06-14 13:25 +0200
    He used the game Hover Racing as an example of unseen polygons. If you check the game in action you'll notice the farthest part of the track sometimes blinks letting you see through the road. I've seen this glitch in Ridge Racer and many other commercial games. It doesn't affect playability but it doesn't look good either. Later games like Spyro and 40 Winks used improved 3D engines which looked way better than earlier games.
  • mgarcia: 2021-06-25 11:15 +0200
    I think that has to do with the fixed point math of the GTE, creating issues with poly's that are very close or very far away... that's a guess though.

    Also, I'm not sure if it's related, I read somewhere, that quads were handled using the same algorithm as triangles for visibility, only using the first 2 points iirc... I can't remember the source.

    Yes, custom engines fixed it, with Sony releasing more hardware info, better SDK's, and years of experience with it, but Net Yaroze is a time capsule of 1996 libGS, I don't see it as an issue or glitch, it is what it is and it's mostly seen now as nostalgic of that time. : )

    I think anyway.

Comments are open.

Your name or alias (required):

Your plain text comment (required):

Your entered name and comment will be displayed above this form.
There is no reply notifications or editing of comments.
Spam, swearing or off topic comments will be removed.

 Enter value: 9766  

Page last modified on June 25, 2021, at 11:15 AM and visited 1498 times.

Powered by PmWiki. No cookies used.